Amazon apologises for offensive t-shirts promoting rape and domestic violence …

Capture

AMAZON APOLOGISES – BUT IS THIS GOOD ENOUGH?

Well guys, an update on this.

24 hours after these offensive slogans about rape were found on the internet giant’s Amazon website, Amazon has APOLOGISED. Mainstream media were very slow at picking up the story which had been buzzing around social media 6 or 7 hours before it hit the mainstream. Just goes to show the galvanising power of twitter, facebook, youtube etc as a force for good.

Hopefully now Amazon will learn a lesson for the future, and avoid using algorithms that generate such hate-filled messages. They have promised to remove the line from their website.

But will we trust them now? What do you guys think?

Online Retail hits new low as Amazon.co.uk found selling t-shirts that glamorise Rape.

Capture

Well, it takes a lot to shock me.

And what I saw via the medium of social media, and already being retweeted across the blogosphere did.

Amazon.co.uk in their wisdom appear to have allowed a private retailer to hawk their wares with titles such as Keep Calm and Rape on, Keep Calm and Rape Me, you get the picture.

I just wonder – what the bloody hell do they think they are playing at? Isn’t there some sort of vetting of products to determine whether they are appropriate? This particular “clothing range” if you can call it that, can be found in the ‘novelty’ clothing section of the site.

I wonder what their response will be – I don’t see how anyone can possibly find that acceptable, or funny at all. Is there some really twisted joke I am missing out on? It is hard enough for Women (and some men) especially to report a crime of this nature without the prospect of the word rape being legitimised through this sort of nonsense. According to an article by the Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2013/jan/11/male-female-rape-statistics-graphic) one in five (that’s right ONE in FIVE) has been the victim of an attempted or actual sexual offence. This is a shocking statistic, and a grisly reminder of why we cannot let this sort of casual attitude towards using the word ‘rape’ stand. The human cost is too great.

For those who have been affected by the serious nature of this blog post please remember there are charities around like Rape Crisis (www.rapecrisis.org.uk) or the Samaritans (samaritans.org) who can lend a listening ear.

Link: http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=keep+calm+and+rape&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Akeep+calm+and+rape

Nicholas Bieber

Picture this: your car driving by itself along the M1 as you sit back and relax – now hold that thought.

Oxford University have recently been running tests on a car at one of their recent events to see if it can drive by itself on familiar routes.

The technology uses lasers and small cameras to memorise regular journeys, such as the school run or the morning rush hour to work.

6280789661_130c7082fb

The engineers and researchers behind the project are aiming to produce a low cost system that “takes the strain” off drivers – which could see the end of all those endless adverts reminding you to take a break when you’re feeling tired behind the wheel.

However, despite being one of the leading universities of the world, Oxford isn’t the only who has been testing this technological revelation out, with other companies such as Google also testing driverless vehicle technology.

View original post 389 more words

Eastleigh: What are the implications for this swing-seat for the UK and Europe?

Dads_army

Well, if you haven’t already heard, the Liberal Democrats man Mike Thornton won the Eastleigh by election, with UKIP coming in a close second and the Tories Maria Hutchings (their very own version of Sarah Palin) trailing in at a miserable third.

Politicians, and I am sure they won’t get much sympathy here, haven’t had an easy ride of late. There is widespread dissatisfaction with the way the country is being run by the Coalition. The ‘Lib-Dems’ are fire-fighting allegations of sexual impropriety and mismanagement of complaints within their own party, the alternative of having Ed Milliband in power at a future date, when really we all preferred the other one (David) gives us the heeby-jeebies, and the Labour Party have had their own fair share of drama too!  All this inevitably means there is a veritable smorgasbord of crapola within the political system. Where does it all end?

What does this mean for the ordinary man or woman on the street? Well, it certainly heightens old and ever present prejudices and tensions about immigration. According to the Office for National Statistics, there was a drop (that’s right) a drop in the numbers of immigrants coming to live in the UK this year (from 247,000 in 2011 to 163,000 in 2012). However around half of Britons according to a study by Oxford University (http://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/briefings/uk-public-opinion-toward-immigration-overall-attitudes-and-level-concern) find immigration to be unpopular, and three-quarters of us would prefer the Government to be tougher on immigration.

Which lands us with UKIP coming a close second in an area that is predominantly (92.7%) white. In this context you can see why UKIP may have been chosen as a ‘protest’ vote versus the other grey matter of the competition. If the same thing were to occur in the General Election then the Conservatives would have something to worry about as would presumably any future immigrants.

But as they say statistics can be used to justify absolutely anything. Whilst I think the British Public want to be tough on immigration, I don’t think this means that necessarily negative attitudes towards incumbent immigrants follow this trend of tough love. As we are increasingly living and working in a multicultural society immigration is a present fact that we all need to accept. It brings a number of benefits in the shape of attracting workers with unique skills that aren’t present in British society, allowing us to embrace different cultures and ways of living, making us more rounded and ultimately tolerant individuals, in my humble opinion.

This is why I worry that if UKIP ever get into power, that much like the BNP or other extreme right-wing parties, they will foist an agenda on the British people that they didn’t sign up for, and don’t realise the long-term negative implications of. Especially with respect to EU migration, if we stop/severely limit the flow, then we are nowhere near powerful enough financially to make it on our own, the books just don’t balance that way. That is why I wonder if Nigel Farage will moderate his rhetoric and provide a more nuanced debate on what needs to be done to get Britain out of the economic slump without alienating our European neighbours. Maybe then, UKIP would be a viable alternative. Until then, I’m not holding my breath.